PropertyHuat

See past the listing.

OverviewAnalyticsNew LaunchesNewsGuidesCalculatorLoan TenureWatchlist
Market Data
URA • data.gov.sg
© 2026 PropertyHuat
See past the listing.
About·Privacy·T&C·Contact

District 28 - Seletar, Yio Chu Kang

OCR - 1634 transactions in last 3 years

District 28 (Seletar, Yio Chu Kang) is in the Outside Central Region - the suburban heartlands where entry prices are lowest and gross yields tend to be highest, supported by HDB upgrader demand and family-oriented amenities.

Last transaction: 2026-07-01. Source: URA private residential PMI.

Key Metrics

Median PSF
$1,498
3-year window
Gross Rental Yield
3.6%
annualised, before costs
3Y Appreciation
+3.0%
median PSF CAGR
Supply PressureiHow much new supply is waiting in the pipeline versus how fast the district normally turns over. 1x = the pipeline holds about 1 year of normal demand. 3x = roughly 3 years; once it's that high, new launches tend to weigh on resale prices because buyers have lots of alternatives. Calculated as: incoming pipeline units (excluding already-TOP'd projects) ÷ avg annual district transactions across resale and new-sale. For nascent districts with a thin historical base (Marina South, Tengah-style new towns), the denominator is floored at 50 txns/year so the ratio is not artificially inflated.How much new supply is waiting in the pipeline versus how fast the district normally turns over. 1x = the pipeline holds about 1 year of normal demand. 3x = roughly 3 years; once it's that high, new launches tend to weigh on resale prices because buyers have lots of alternatives. Calculated as: incoming pipeline units (excluding already-TOP'd projects) ÷ avg annual district transactions across resale and new-sale. For nascent districts with a thin historical base (Marina South, Tengah-style new towns), the denominator is floored at 50 txns/year so the ratio is not artificially inflated.
0.8x
minimal incoming supply

Investment Score

56 / 100

Composite of appreciation (40%), yield (20%), supply (20%), schools (20%) - ranked against all 28 districts.

3Y Appreciation(40%)
+3.0%
Gross Yield(20%)
3.6%
Supply Pressure(20%)
0.8x (lower = better)
Schools(20%)
None

Top Transacted Projects

Ranked by transaction volume in the last 3 years.

  • 1HIGH PARK RESIDENCES
    PSF$1,614
    vs cble+3.6%
    Yield3.7%
    Txns (3Y)225
    Pipeline-
  • 2THE TOPIARY
    PSF$1,456
    vs cble+0.9%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)148
    Pipeline-
  • 3PARC BOTANNIA
    PSF$1,633
    vs cble+6.1%
    Yield3.9%
    Txns (3Y)132
    Pipeline-
  • 4RIVERTREES RESIDENCES
    PSF$1,512
    vs cble+0.2%
    Yield3.6%
    Txns (3Y)74
    Pipeline-
  • 5RIVERBANK @ FERNVALE
    PSF$1,437
    vs cble-5.5%
    Yield3.8%
    Txns (3Y)73
    Pipeline-
  • 6H2O RESIDENCES
    PSF$1,412
    vs cble-5.8%
    Yield3.4%
    Txns (3Y)70
    Pipeline-
  • 7LUSH ACRES
    PSF$1,379
    vs cble-3.2%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)65
    Pipeline-
  • 8THE GREENWICH
    PSF$1,324
    vs cble-14.6%
    Yield4.0%
    Txns (3Y)57
    Pipeline-
  • 9SELETAR PARK RESIDENCE
    PSF$1,308
    vs cble-14.8%
    Yield3.8%
    Txns (3Y)53
    Pipeline-
  • 10SUNRISE GARDENS
    PSF$1,057
    vs cble+1.5%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)36
    Pipeline-
  • 11SELETAR SPRINGS CONDOMINIUM
    PSF$1,031
    vs cble-1.6%
    Yield3.4%
    Txns (3Y)36
    Pipeline-
  • 12GRANDE VISTA
    PSF$1,267
    vs cble-2.6%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)26
    Pipeline-
  • 13MIMOSA PARK
    PSF$1,321
    vs cble+3.6%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)14
    Pipeline-
  • 14PARC GREENWICH
    PSF$1,435
    vs cble—
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)10
    Pipeline-
  • 15NIM GARDENS
    PSF$1,284
    vs cble+0.7%
    YieldN/A
    Txns (3Y)9
    Pipeline-
#ProjectMedian PSFvs cbleGross YieldTxns (3Y)Incoming Units
1HIGH PARK RESIDENCES$1,614+3.6%3.7%225-
2THE TOPIARY$1,456+0.9%N/A148-
3PARC BOTANNIA$1,633+6.1%3.9%132-
4RIVERTREES RESIDENCES$1,512+0.2%3.6%74-
5RIVERBANK @ FERNVALE$1,437-5.5%3.8%73-
6H2O RESIDENCES$1,412-5.8%3.4%70-
7LUSH ACRES$1,379-3.2%N/A65-
8THE GREENWICH$1,324-14.6%4.0%57-
9SELETAR PARK RESIDENCE$1,308-14.8%3.8%53-
10SUNRISE GARDENS$1,057+1.5%N/A36-
11SELETAR SPRINGS CONDOMINIUM$1,031-1.6%3.4%36-
12GRANDE VISTA$1,267-2.6%N/A26-
13MIMOSA PARK$1,321+3.6%N/A14-
14PARC GREENWICH$1,435—N/A10-
15NIM GARDENS$1,284+0.7%N/A9-

About this number

"Priced vs comparable" compares a sale's PSF to the median of genuinely like-for-like recent resale transactions: the same district, the same property class (private or executive condominium), the same tenure band (freehold, or leasehold grouped by remaining years), and the same bedroom count, over the last three years. New launches are excluded from the benchmark, so a brand-new project has no signal until it builds a resale history.

A negative figure means the unit transacted below comparable resale, a positive figure above. The gap can reflect location within the district, unit size, floor, facing, freshness, or condition, so read it as relative pricing rather than a verdict on value.

Benchmarks appear only where at least five comparable resale sales exist, and not where a project's pricing sits outside the comparable range (for example ultra-prime freehold in a mixed district). Source: URA caveat data.

Amenities

No tracked primary schools in this district.

Incoming Supply

  • Pollen Collection II
    186 unitsTOP 2027
  • Landed housing development
    156 unitsTOP na
  • Pollen Collection
    132 unitsTOP 2026
  • Belgravia Ace
    107 unitsTOP 2028
← All districtsCompare OCR districts